BestSyndication Forums Forum Index

Search the web   Search this site


 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Best Syndication Blogs
      BestSyndication.com    Our Amazon Store

Karl Rove

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BestSyndication Forums Forum Index -> National News

View previous topic :: View next topic  

Should Karl be indicted?
Yes
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
No
50%
 50%  [ 1 ]
Probably
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Probably not
50%
 50%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 2

Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 11:11 am    Post subject: Karl Rove Reply with quote

The grand jury investigating the CIA leak case pressed White House senior adviser Karl Rove yesterday to more fully explain his conversations with reporters about CIA operative Valerie Plame, including discrepancies between his testimony and the account provided by a key witness in the investigation, according to a source familiar with Rove's account.

Making his fourth appearance before the grand jury, Rove answered a broad range of questions for 4 1/2 hours, including why he did not initially tell federal agents about a July 2003 conversation about Plame with the witness, Time magazine's Matthew Cooper, the source said.

Rove's defense team asserts that President Bush's deputy chief of staff has not committed a crime but nevertheless anticipates that special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald could find a way to bring charges in the next two weeks, the source said.

"The special counsel has not advised Mr. Rove that he is a target of the investigation and affirmed that he has made no decision concerning charges," Robert Luskin, Rove's attorney, said in a statement.

Fitzgerald is believed to be in the final days of a 22-month investigation into whether any administration officials knowingly identified Plame to the media to retaliate against her husband, an outspoken critic of the Iraq war. White House officials are bracing for the possibility that Rove; I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, the vice president's chief of staff; or other officials could be indicted.

But it remains a mystery who -- if anyone -- will be charged in the case. The grand jury expires Oct. 28.

One person who will not be charged is Judith Miller, the New York Times reporter who spent 85 days in jail for refusing to testify in the case before making two recent appearances before the grand jury. Miller was recently told by Fitzgerald that she is only a witness in the case, according to a source close to Miller.

"Judy has always been a witness in this case and nothing more," said Robert S. Bennett, Miller's attorney. "She is neither a subject nor a target of the investigation."

A team of Times reporters is preparing a report on Miller's role in the saga that could be published as early as tomorrow. Until a contempt-of-court citation against her was lifted, Miller refused to tell her story to the paper on the advice of her lawyers. But Times spokeswoman Catherine Mathis said yesterday that Miller is now cooperating with fellow reporters on the story.

Rove, the mastermind of Bush's political career, who is considered the leading architect of White House political and policy plans, has emerged as a central figure in the investigation. In addition to his four trips to the grand jury, he spoke with investigators several times early in the probe.

His story has changed from the earliest days, when he told reporters he had nothing to do with the leak of Plame's name. Since then, Rove has testified that he discussed Plame in passing with two reporters, including Robert D. Novak, whose July 14, 2003, syndicated column first publicly identified Plame as a CIA operative married to former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV.

On July 6, 2003, Wilson said publicly that he had found no evidence for the administration's claim that Iraq was seeking uranium for use in a nuclear weapons program. Wilson had been sent to the African nation of Niger by the CIA to investigate that claim.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/14/AR2005101402076.html


Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love these scandals, especially when they involve the guy everyone considers to be the architect of the Presidents successful election. How much closer to the President can you get?

This is more interesting than Vice President Agnew’s fall. This case involves unpatriotic revelations of our spies. If he did it, and it looks that way, then I hope he grabs onto someone else’s shirt tail as he falls.
Back to top
aliaslezarddagain
Forum Guru


Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 1490
Location: somewhere between the begining and the end

PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Miller is probably the one who deseminated the actual name of the person and she has "time served" already.

It would be pretty hard to prove that anyone of these people knew she was a spy, especialy if she wasn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    BestSyndication Forums Forum Index -> National News All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


 

Forum Directory

 Resources:  Google News  Bing News    Wikipedia     Free Picture Hosting   PhotoBucket   Online Dictionary   CIA FactBook    Avatars   YouTube

Contact Us    

Faster Than Light Forum Libertarian Party of Florida Forums Debate    
The Daily Press Forum Red Nova Science Forum Auspet Pet Forum
Health Forum My Victorville VV Local
PoochSchool.com WrongwoodCALIF.com Political Inversion
Pentagraph Forum OC Connect Forum Listen To Radio Stations Online